Brennan’s Clearance Revoked

Source: rt.com

Trump has revoked the security clearance of former CIA director John Brennan. Trump said Brennan was complicit in creating a divided and chaotic environment within the agency.

Brennan has been hyper critical of the Trump administration. He has called for Trump’s impeachment most recently regarding the Helsinki summit. He joined NBC News as a senior national security and intelligence analyst and he has used this platform to voice his derision for the President. He has also been highly vocal on social media platforms.John O. Brennan

@JohnBrennan
It’s astounding how often you fail to live up to minimum standards of decency, civility, & probity. Seems like you will never understand what it means to be president, nor what it takes to be a good, decent, & honest person. So disheartening, so dangerous for our Nation.
Source: twitter.com

According to the White House press secretary, Sarah Sanders, the Trump administration is also looking into revoking the clearances of several former government officials to include former FBI director Comey and FBI agent Strzok.

Agent 5

Source: dailymail.co.uk

With news of the participation of many agents as well as leaders of the FBI being complicit in the failed manipulation of the US election process, it may behoove one to educate themselves on the actual purpose of the FBI.  Is this arm of the federal assigned to the task of steering whom is elected?

According to fbi.gov, their mission is to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States.  Am I missing something, is there an article in the Constitution that addresses the manipulation of elections?  According to the Constitution, there is no mention of the FBI having the authority to sway votes to manipulate the outcome of any election.  It does make mention that Representatives should be chosen by the People but this was only in reference to members of the House of Representatives.  Could it be that the writers of the Constitution meant for all other elections (other than for Members of the House) to be open to manipulation by other federal arms or well heeled financial backers?

The agent in the photo was referred to as ‘agent 5’, it was discovered that this was a pseudonym for Sally Moyer.  She is an attorney and registered Democrat, she has been employed by the FBI since 2006.  She was on the filter team for the Clinton probe, this team was responsible for determining if information obtained should be considered ‘privileged’ or could be used in the investigation.

We should expect that a government agency, along with any corporation, to perform their duties with at the very least a modicum of fair play as well as unbiasedness.  I attached a list of emails between agent 1 and agent 5 for your review.

Source: dailymail.co.uk

On your review of these exchanges, would you conclude that any investigation performed by these agents would be unbiased?  Furthermore, it was determined that agent 1 and agent 5 were romantically link (now I understand that they have married), not that this has any bearing on their obvious dislike for Trump.  I often wonder how people give credence to people just because of their title, such as movie stars, attorneys, politicians and sports figures.

Source: dailymail.co.uk

I included this photo to show that attorneys are just average people, without their suits and coiffured hair.

On election day, she texted:  “You think HRC is gonna win right?  You think we should get nails and some boards in case she doesn’t?”, “[Hillary] better win, [o]therwise I’m gonna be walking around with both my guns.  And likely quitting on the spot.”  You need a college education to major in vitriol.

I have concluded that the FBI is failing in it’s mission statement and is a den of manipulating employees sucking off the taxpayers dime.  I have read about some FBI agents that are actually loyal to the Constitution.  It is a shame for the ones whom aren’t are corrupting the agency.

Strzok Escorted Out of FBI Building

Source: zerohedge.com

Since  the OIG report surfaced, more is being leaked to the public about the chicanery going on behind the closed doors of the FBI.  Based on Strzok being escorted out of the FBI building on Friday, the investigation maybe bearing fruit.

Rest assured the public at large is waiting to see some results as it has been a long time since many have already been convicted in the public’s eye but none have been convicted.  After the tweets between Strzok and Page, how is any kind of defense possible.  Page quitting prior to the release of the OIG report also tends to incriminate their activities.

Aitan Goelman, Strzok’s attorney made a statement “Pete has steadfastly played by the rules and respected the process, and yet he continues to be the target of unfounded personal attacks, political games and inappropriate information leaks”.  In regards to Strzok’s ‘playing by the rules’ one must understand that the rules were likely Comey’s rules and not FBI rules.  Goelman also complains of ‘impartiality of the disciplinary process, which now appears tainted by political influence’, how is this even relevant?  Now the his client is about to be judged of trying to take part in a coup to undermine the president, this attorney complains that the rules Strzok ignored are tainted?  One must scratch their heads in amazement of this attorney’s chutzpah.

All that is left to do is to sit back and hope that some justice prevails.

StishApp

FREE
VIEW